CT Scan

S B Erickson et al. (2011) · Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology

This small randomized trial with 10 people explored whether Cystone, an Ayurvedic herbal tablet sold for kidney stones, changes the urine chemistry that drives stone formation or reduces the amount of stone in the kidneys. Kidney stones are painful and often recur, and the available prevention options (diet changes and medicines such as thiazides, potassium citrate and allopurinol) have drawbacks. Cystone is a blend of seven plants plus purified Shilajeet and a mineral preparation (bhasma), traditionally used for urinary problems, but the authors say earlier studies of it were small and poorly controlled. Ten adults from the Mayo Stone Clinic who repeatedly formed calcium oxalate stones took two Cystone tablets twice a day, or matching placebo, for six weeks each in a crossover design, switching after a one-week break. All then took Cystone openly for another 48 weeks. Urine collected over 24 hours measured how saturated it was with stone-forming minerals. CT scans at the start and after a year, scored with the same method used for heart-artery calcium, measured stone volume, and a radiologist reviewed them without knowing the timing. Cystone did not change urinary measurements in the short term (6 weeks) or the long term (52 weeks). Average stone burden per kidney actually rose from 93 to 114 cubic millimetres (P = 0.07) and from 108 to 136 on the Agatston scale (P = 0.10), neither statistically significant. The radiologist counted 8 kidneys with more stone, 8 unchanged and 2 with less, and four kidneys passed stones spontaneously. No participant described side effects they attributed to Cystone. The authors conclude the trial does not support Cystone for preventing calcium oxalate stones, while noting the sample was tiny, participants had stones that standard treatment had not controlled, and some factors that inhibit stone formation were not measured. They say a longer study with more patients would be needed to look at stone passage or other stone types.

Dan Wang et al. (2026) · JAMA network open

This phase 3 randomized trial of 606 adults in China explored whether Guang Jing, a capsule made from the total flavonoids (plant pigment compounds with antioxidant activity) of the traditional Chinese herb Desmodium styracifolium, helps ureteral stones pass out of the body. A ureteral stone is a mineral deposit lodged in the tube that carries urine from the kidney to the bladder. Treatment that encourages passage is called medical expulsive therapy, and the authors note that alpha-blocker drugs, the guideline option, have shown mixed results in large trials. No oral medicine is currently approved for urolithiasis, and Guang Jing is already approved in China for ureteral stones. Participants were adults aged 18 to 70 with a newly diagnosed ureteral stone of 5 to 10 mm and a traditional Chinese medicine pattern called damp-heat accumulation (urethral burning, lower back pain or blood in the urine). At 34 hospitals, three of every four received 3 capsules (0.6 g) of Guang Jing three times daily for 28 days, and the rest received identical placebo capsules. Neither participants nor investigators knew who received which. Passage was confirmed by CT scan on day 28, read by blinded investigators. By day 28, 44.6% of the Guang Jing group (204 of 457) had passed their stone versus 33.8% of the placebo group (50 of 148). That is a 10.9 percentage point difference (relative risk 1.32, so passage was about one-third more likely; P = .03). At day 14 the groups did not differ significantly (29.1% vs 22.3%; P = .14), and stone movement distance was almost identical (29.5 vs 29.7 mm). Among those with 0.6 to 1.0 cm stones, passage was 37.2% vs 24.4% (a larger gap in the bigger stones), and 66.2% of Guang Jing participants with distal stones, the lower part of the ureter near the bladder, passed them. Adverse events were similar (19.3% vs 18.2%, meaning side effects were about as common with the capsule as with placebo), with no medication-related serious events. The authors describe the absolute benefit as modest, since 55.4% of the Guang Jing group did not pass a stone by day 28. The trial enrolled a fairly uniform group, mostly from southern China, and the subgroup results were exploratory. The authors state that this homogeneous population limits how far the findings generalize, and that CT slice thickness may have missed small differences in stone movement. They plan further trials in Europe and North America and call for studies to identify who benefits most and to establish how the extract works in humans.