BioWell

Tiffany J Barsotti et al. (2023) · Explore (New York, N.Y.)

This exploratory study investigates the effects of encountering a sacred object, specifically the Sri Yantra / Durga Stone, on human biofield responses. The significance of this research lies in its potential to bridge traditional healing practices with modern scientific understanding, particularly in the context of enhancing well-being through sacred objects. The study aims to explore how such encounters influence emotional and physical health, addressing a gap in existing literature regarding the biofield and sacred spaces. The study employed a pre-post single group design with a sample size of 17 participants, aged 38 to 79, consisting of 12 women and 5 men, all of whom provided informed consent. Participants engaged with the sacred object by placing their hand on the Sri Yantra / Durga Stone for up to 3 minutes, optionally reciting a mantra. Outcomes were measured using a Bio-Well device, which assessed emotional pressure, energy levels, and readings from various organ systems before and after the encounter. The intervention was conducted at the Sri Narayani Golden Temple in Vellore, India, with no specific treatment provided beyond the encounter itself. Results indicated a significant increase in the overall Bio-Well energy state, with baseline levels of 53.78 significantly lower than pre-exposure levels of 60.54 (p = 0.005) and post-exposure levels of 66.78 (p < 0.001). Significant changes were also observed in cardiovascular (F(2,32) = 11.441, p < 0.001) and endocrine system assessments (F(2,32) = 10.34, p = 0.001). However, emotional pressure and left/right symmetry measures did not show significant changes (p = 0.017 and p = 0.156, respectively). Participants reported enhanced feelings of energy, emotional balance, and a sense of peace, with no adverse events noted during the study. The findings suggest that exposure to sacred objects may enhance emotional and physical well-being, indicating potential therapeutic applications in clinical settings. However, the study's limitations include the absence of a control group and the short duration of exposure, which may affect the validity and generalizability of the results. Practitioners may consider incorporating similar interventions into therapeutic practices to explore their benefits further. Future research should include control conditions and longer engagement times with sacred objects to better assess their effects on the human biofield and overall health.

Madhu Pandey et al. (2025) · Annals of neurosciences

This study explores the therapeutic benefits of 'Vancharya', a nature-based intervention, on the bio-field of young adults. The research involved 50 participants and aimed to assess the impact of this ancient practice on various subtle energy systems, revealing significant improvements in energy metrics and overall well-being. The findings suggest that 'Vancharya' could serve as a valuable therapeutic option for enhancing mental health among young adults. The study employed a non-experimental single-group pre- and post-research design with a sample size of 50 college students aged 17-19. Participants engaged in a seven-day intervention that included activities such as alternate nostril breathing, tree hugging, and listening to bird sounds, all conducted in a mango orchard setting. Outcomes were measured using a Biowell machine, which assessed parameters like aura field, chakra alignment, and stress levels before and after the intervention. Each session lasted one hour and occurred daily for seven consecutive days. Results indicated significant improvements in the aura field (AF: M pre = 36.94, M post = 44.82, t = −12.40, p < .001), overall chakra alignment (OCA: M pre = 63.52, M post = 79.72, t = −7.44, p < .001), and overall chakra energy (OCE: M pre = 4.16, M post = 5.07, t = −8.44, p < .001). However, stress levels (SL: M pre = 6.79, M post = 5.58, p = 1.000) and overall energy levels (OEL: M pre = 45.61, M post = 49.38, p = .133) did not show significant changes. Participants reported qualitative improvements such as enhanced emotional stability and clarity of thought, with no adverse events noted during the study. The findings suggest that 'Vancharya' may enhance emotional regulation and sleep quality among young adults, making it a potential addition to wellness programs aimed at addressing mental health issues. However, the study's limitations, including a small sample size and the lack of significant changes in stress levels, highlight the need for further research. The authors propose 'Vancharya' as a candidate component of mental health interventions, and call for longer intervention durations and more diverse populations to validate these results and understand the mechanisms involved.

David Muehsam et al. (2015) · Global advances in health and medicine

The study provides an overview of biofield devices, which are instruments designed to measure or manipulate biofield interactions that influence biological functions and health outcomes. The significance of this research lies in its potential to enhance understanding of the interconnectedness of biological processes and psychosocial factors, thereby advancing clinical applications in health and wellness. The objective is to review existing biofield devices, particularly those supported by peer-reviewed evidence, to identify promising modalities for further investigation. The study emphasizes the need for interdisciplinary research to validate the efficacy and mechanisms of these devices. The methods employed in this study include a comprehensive review of existing biofield devices, focusing on those with peer-reviewed support. The review does not specify a sample size or participant characteristics, as it synthesizes findings from various studies rather than conducting original research. The intervention involves examining the operational mechanisms of different biofield devices and their therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Outcomes are measured through a qualitative assessment of the devices' mechanisms and their clinical implications, with an emphasis on the need for robust experimental protocols. The study highlights the importance of addressing methodological challenges in biofield research. The findings indicate that a variety of biofield devices exist, some with well-understood mechanisms and clinical applications, while others remain poorly understood. The authors interpret these findings as indicative of a biophysical basis for biofield coordination, suggesting that these devices can influence biological processes through subtle signaling. There are potential clinical implications, including the provision of low-cost, personalized diagnostic and therapeutic options. However, the study acknowledges significant limitations, such as the complexity of biofield interactions and the current lack of understanding regarding the mechanisms behind these modalities. Non-significant findings include the absence of specific statistical data, as the review synthesizes qualitative insights rather than quantitative results. In conclusion, biofield devices represent a significant advancement in biofield science, highlighting the need for further research and interdisciplinary collaboration. The development of these devices could lead to more personalized and humane medical practices, enhancing our understanding of interconnectedness within various biological systems. Future research should focus on systematic studies of biofield interactions and their implications for science and medicine. The study emphasizes the necessity for comprehensive investigations and sufficient funding to explore the potential of biofield devices effectively.