Therapeutic Exercise

Nicolas Vaillancourt et al. (2026) · Pain management

This two-arm randomized controlled trial with 36 adults compared 10 weeks of aquatic (pool-based) exercise therapy against a standard land-based care program for chronic low back pain (CLBP) — pain lasting more than three months without a clear structural cause. Beyond the usual measures of pain and disability, the study also tracked psychological factors that keep chronic pain going: pain catastrophizing (dwelling on and magnifying pain), kinesiophobia (fear of movement or reinjury), anxiety, depression, and sleep disturbance — factors most exercise trials for back pain don't examine. Participants, aged 18 to 65, trained twice a week for 60 minutes over 10 weeks, one-on-one with a certified athletic therapist. The aquatic group did dynamic lumbar-stabilization, core, hip and aerobic circuit exercises in a therapeutic pool, where water's buoyancy takes weight off the spine and its resistance still builds strength. The standard-care group received an individualized land-based mix of hands-on manual therapy (spinal mobilization, myofascial release) and progressive stabilization and strength exercise — reflecting the real-world care most people with CLBP actually receive. Thirty-four people completed the study; both groups attended more than 85% of sessions, and no one had an adverse event. Both programs worked: pain, disability, physical and overall quality of life, pain catastrophizing, and anxiety/depression all improved significantly in both groups by 10 weeks, with disability improvements (18-point and 13-point drops) comfortably clearing the threshold considered clinically meaningful, and neither group pulling statistically ahead of the other on any of these. The one place aquatic therapy stood out on its own was kinesiophobia and sleep: only the aquatic group's improvement in fear-of-movement scores and sleep-disturbance scores reached statistical significance, likely because moving safely and painlessly in water helps people rebuild confidence that movement won't hurt them. That said, the aquatic group wasn't statistically better than standard care on these two measures either — it simply crossed the bar for significance within its own group while standard care came close but didn't. These results support aquatic therapy as a genuinely comparable — and possibly, on fear of movement and sleep, slightly favorable — alternative to standard hands-on and land-exercise care for chronic low back pain. The study is small (34 completers), was originally powered to detect a different outcome in its parent trial, and its therapists weren't blinded to which treatment they were giving, so these encouraging psychological findings need confirmation in larger, purpose-built trials before they can be treated as settled.

Georgios Mavropalias et al. (2022) · Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)

This randomized trial with 106 women getting radiation therapy for breast cancer tested whether a 12-week program of home-based exercise -- with no gym or supervision required -- could reduce cancer-related fatigue and improve quality of life during and after treatment. Cancer-related fatigue is an overwhelming tiredness affecting most breast cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy, and unlike ordinary tiredness, it does not resolve with rest alone. Conducted in Australia, the trial split participants into an exercise group, who received a one-on-one session with an exercise specialist plus biweekly phone check-ins, a resistance band, a pedometer, and an exercise guide, or a usual-care group with no exercise support. Eighty-nine women (43 exercise, 46 usual care) completed the full study. Fatigue was tracked weekly during the 6-week radiation course and at several points afterward using validated fatigue and quality-of-life questionnaires, along with measures of sleep and physical activity, over a full 12 months of follow-up. Women in the exercise group felt less fatigued than the usual-care group at several points during radiation treatment and recovered faster once treatment ended, while the usual-care group's fatigue did not meaningfully improve until 6 weeks after finishing radiation and took a full year to fully resolve. Quality of life followed a similar pattern, improving sooner and more in the exercise group. Sleep quality was poor in both groups throughout the study and did not improve with exercise. Notably, the women only managed modest amounts of exercise -- about 1 to 2 strength sessions and 30 to 40 minutes of cardio per week, less than typical guidelines recommend -- yet still saw real benefits, and no one was hurt by the program. These results suggest that even a small, home-based, unsupervised amount of exercise can meaningfully speed up recovery from cancer-related fatigue and improve quality of life during breast cancer radiotherapy, without needing a gym, a trainer, or a large time commitment. However, the study lacked a group that skipped radiotherapy entirely, so it cannot fully separate the effects of exercise from the natural course of treatment, and the fatigue and quality-of-life benefits appeared to fade once the structured 12-week program ended, suggesting ongoing activity is needed to keep the benefits going.

Anna Pyszora et al. (2017) · Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer

This randomized trial with 60 adults tested whether a short course of physiotherapy could ease cancer-related fatigue in people with advanced cancer who were receiving palliative (comfort-focused) rather than curative care -- a group rarely included in fatigue research even though fatigue is one of their most common and distressing symptoms, often dismissed as an inevitable part of advanced illness rather than something physiotherapy could actually help treat. Conducted at a palliative care unit and hospice in Poland, the study split participants evenly into a physiotherapy group and a no-exercise control group, with everyone continuing their usual medications. The physiotherapy group did six 30-minute sessions over two weeks, combining gentle active arm-and-leg exercises with myofascial release (a hands-on technique that eases tight connective tissue) and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, or PNF (stretching-and-contracting patterns that improve movement and reduce stiffness). Fatigue and its impact on daily life were measured with the Brief Fatigue Inventory, while nine common symptoms -- including pain, mood and appetite -- were tracked with the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale. By day 8, the physiotherapy group already showed significantly less fatigue than the control group, and by day 12 their fatigue scores had dropped from about 6.4 to 4.4 out of 10 (p<0.01) across every fatigue measure, while the control group barely changed on most items. The therapy group also reported significantly less pain, depression, anxiety and drowsiness, and better appetite and overall well-being (all p<0.01) -- benefits the control group did not show over the same two weeks. Nearly all physiotherapy patients (26 of 29 evaluated) rated the program positively on a satisfaction scale, and not a single patient rated it negatively, suggesting the approach was both effective and well tolerated even in a population that is frail and seriously ill, which many clinicians would have assumed could not handle any exercise at all. These results suggest that even patients in palliative care, who are often assumed too frail for exercise, can safely benefit from a brief, well-tailored physiotherapy program that reduces fatigue and improves overall comfort. The study's small size, single location, lack of blinding, and short two-week follow-up mean the findings need confirmation in larger, longer trials, and a chance imbalance in gender between the two groups (more women ended up in the control group) is a limitation worth noting, though it did not appear to affect the fatigue results.

Eduardo J Fernandez-Rodriguez et al. (2023) · International journal of environmental research and public health

This randomized clinical trial with 48 cancer patients explored whether a one-month, home-based program combining supervised exercise with functional rehabilitation could reduce cancer-related fatigue and help patients regain independence after being discharged from an oncology hospital stay. Cancer-related fatigue, also called asthenia (tiredness without a clear physical cause), affects most cancer patients yet is often dismissed by care teams as an unavoidable side effect rather than something that can be actively treated with structured therapy. Conducted in Salamanca, Spain, the trial split 48 recently hospitalized patients (average age about 63, with lung, digestive, prostate and breast cancers) into two equal groups. Both received standard cancer care, but one group also completed daily home exercise sessions (short aerobic-and-strength workouts, twice a day) plus hands-on retraining in daily activities like dressing and moving safely, energy-saving strategies, and sleep coaching. Independence, fatigue, quality of life, physical performance and fear of movement were measured before treatment, at 15 days, and at 1 month by evaluators who did not know which group each patient was in. Patients in the exercise-and-rehabilitation group showed significantly better independence, less cancer-related fatigue, and stronger physical performance than the control group at both check-ins (p<0.001 for the final comparisons on all three), while the control group's scores stayed flat or worsened over the same month. Fear of movement related to fatigue also improved more in the treatment group by the one-month mark. Pain levels did not differ meaningfully between groups. Quality-of-life results were more mixed: one specific overall-wellbeing rating improved more with treatment, but the broader quality-of-life questionnaire actually improved slightly more in the control group, a puzzling result the researchers think may reflect that instrument's limits for this population. These results suggest a structured, home-based exercise and rehabilitation program can meaningfully help newly discharged cancer patients regain daily independence and feel less fatigued. However, patients could not be kept unaware of which group they were in, the study ran for only one month so longer-term benefits are unknown, it took place at a single hospital, and adherence relied on patients' own reports. Larger, longer trials with cancer-specific quality-of-life tools are needed to confirm and extend these findings.

Gert Bronfort et al. (2022) · Chiropractic & manual therapies

Low back pain touches an estimated 40-80% of adults at some point, and when it becomes chronic, it is a major driver of disability, missed work, and long-term opioid use. Guidelines recommend combining conventional care with complementary approaches like spinal manipulation, exercise, and acupuncture, but most back pain treatment in practice still relies on a single approach. This year-long randomized trial in Minneapolis compared standard chiropractic care against a coordinated team approach -- chiropractors, acupuncturists, massage therapists, psychologists, exercise therapists, and a physician working together -- to see whether combining disciplines beats chiropractic care alone for people with ongoing low back pain. 201 adults with long-standing back pain (on average, pain for 8 to 9 years) were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of either chiropractic-only care or the multidisciplinary team approach, with a case manager coordinating each patient's individualized plan. Both groups showed strong participation -- over 90% attended their recommended visits. Researchers tracked back pain intensity as the main outcome, alongside disability, quality of life, and patient satisfaction, checking in at 4, 12, 26, and 52 weeks after the study began. Over the full year, the team-based approach edged out chiropractic-only care on pain intensity, with the clearest advantage showing up at the one-year mark. The team approach also showed a meaningful, statistically significant advantage for disability, overall improvement, satisfaction with care, and how often people experienced back symptoms -- though pain relief itself, while favoring the team approach throughout, only reached statistical significance at certain checkpoints (mainly week 52). Things like quality of life, medication use, and fear of movement did not differ meaningfully between the two approaches. Both approaches were very safe: only five serious health events occurred over the year (mostly unrelated conditions like pneumonia or a fractured foot), and about half of participants in both groups reported mild, temporary side effects like increased soreness -- at nearly identical rates whichever approach they received. In people with chronic low back pain, this trial found that a coordinated team of practitioners — rather than chiropractic care alone — gave a modest edge, mainly on disability and overall satisfaction, without added safety risk. That said, the study's participants were not very racially or economically diverse, and the exact process used to decide each patient's treatment plan had not itself been formally validated, so the results may not translate perfectly to every clinic. Still, the findings support integrated, team-based care as a reasonable option on the evidence here.

Filip Gedin et al. (2025) · BMC musculoskeletal disorders

This Swedish trial asked whether a chiropractor, a physiotherapist, or advice to stay active works best for low back pain lasting months — and the honest answer is that it could not tell the three apart. Eighty-eight people at ten primary care clinics around Stockholm were randomly assigned to one of four things: advice only, physiotherapy, chiropractic care, or both together. Six months later, everyone was better. Disability scores dropped in every group — most in the chiropractic group, least in the physiotherapy group — but the gaps between groups were well within what chance alone would produce. Pain scores and quality of life told the same story: improvement everywhere, no clear winner. Where the groups did differ was cost. The advice-only group ended up costing the health system about three times more than the others — around SEK 11,000 per person versus roughly SEK 3,000 — mostly because those patients went on to see doctors more, and one of them had spine surgery. Getting hands-on treatment early appeared to head off more expensive care later, though with numbers this small a single surgery moves the whole average. Combining chiropractic care with physiotherapy came out best on the economics: slightly more quality-adjusted life years for slightly less money. But "slightly" is doing a lot of work — the difference across all four groups was eight thousandths of a QALY, which is roughly three days of perfect health. The researchers are unusually candid about the limits. They wanted far more participants than they got, nearly half the people dropped out before six months, and the four groups were not well matched at the start. They present this as a lesson for whoever runs the definitive trial next, not as a result to act on. What it does support, gently: for chronic low back pain, staying active matters, and both chiropractic care and physiotherapy are reasonable, comparably effective options — with some signal that getting treatment rather than advice alone may save money downstream.