False Daisy (Bhringraj)

Janmejaya Samal (2015) · Journal of intercultural ethnopharmacology

This systematic review pooled published research on using Ayurveda, India's traditional medical system, alongside standard drugs for pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) — a bacterial lung infection that remains one of India's leading causes of death. The review searched PubMed through April 2015 and found six studies worth including: four human trials testing Ayurvedic herbal formulas as add-ons to standard anti-TB drugs (ATDs), and two lab studies testing plant extracts directly against the TB bacterium. In Ayurveda, PTB is traditionally understood as Rajayakshma, a wasting condition tied to depleted bodily tissues (dhatu) and vital reserve (ojas) — explaining why many of the formulas studied are rejuvenative "Rasayana" tonics rather than antibiotics. The four clinical trials enrolled 30 to 133 PTB patients each, all in India, and ran from 28 days to 6-8 months. Participants took Ayurvedic formulas — a nine-herb Rasayana capsule, a liquid tonic called Bhringarajasava, Ashwagandha with Chyawanprash, or a hepatoprotective blend called Liv-600 — alongside their prescribed drug regimen (DOTS). Researchers tracked symptoms like cough and fever, body weight, X-ray changes, drug blood levels, and liver enzymes. The two lab studies tested leaf and plant extracts against TB bacteria in culture, measuring the lowest concentration that stopped bacterial growth. Across the trials, Ayurvedic add-ons consistently eased symptoms and supported weight gain more than standard treatment alone (p<0.001 in the largest trial). One striking finding: Ashwagandha plus Chyawanprash raised blood levels of two key TB drugs, isoniazid and pyrazinamide, by 7-10% (meaning the body absorbed more of the medicine that actually kills the bacteria) — potentially valuable given rising drug resistance. The hepatoprotective blend showed no harmful rise in liver enzymes, suggesting it may guard against the liver damage these drugs can cause. In the lab, extracts from four of five tested legumes completely stopped bacterial growth at a low concentration (50 micrograms per milliliter), and extracts from five other plants inhibited even drug-resistant TB strains by up to 95%. These findings position Ayurvedic formulas as promising supportive care — easing symptoms, protecting the liver, and possibly boosting drug absorption — rather than replacements for standard TB treatment, which no study tested. The evidence base is thin: only six studies total, all small, mostly from India, with just one describing blinding and none pooling results statistically. The authors call for properly designed clinical trials of the lab-active plants, especially against multidrug-resistant TB. The evidence reviewed concerns Ayurvedic preparations as adjuncts to prescribed drug therapy; none of it addresses their use instead of it.

Saylee Deshmukh et al. (2025) · Frontiers in pharmacology

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined whether Ayurvedic treatments — herbs, traditional formulations, and purification procedures — can genuinely lower blood pressure in essential hypertension, the symptomless condition that drives much of the world's heart disease and stroke. Researchers screened over 22,000 records from six databases, including India's AYUSH Research Portal, and included 44 studies, with ten randomized controlled trials (524 participants) providing data strong enough to pool statistically. The interventions ranged widely: single herbs like Arjuna (Terminalia arjuna, Ayurveda's principal heart remedy), Rudraksha seed powder, and Eclipta alba extract; polyherbal and herbomineral formulations; and Panchakarma purification procedures such as therapeutic purgation. Treatment durations ran from 10 days to a full year. The meta-analysis compared Ayurveda against two benchmarks — placebo and standard blood-pressure drugs — using Cochrane methods with formal risk-of-bias assessment. The pooled answer was no significant difference either way. Versus placebo, systolic pressure fell a non-significant 2.63 mmHg (95% CI −6.04 to 0.79, p=0.13); versus standard drugs the gap was essentially zero (−0.22 mmHg, p=0.47) — Ayurveda neither beat the drugs nor clearly lost to them. Heterogeneity was extreme (I² up to 98%), meaning the trials disagreed sharply: two of three placebo-controlled and five of eight drug-controlled trials individually favored Ayurveda, while others favored the comparator. Uncontrolled before-after studies showed large drops of 16–29 mmHg, but those designs cannot separate treatment effects from regression to the mean. No adverse events were reported where safety was tracked. The honest takeaway on Ayurvedic care for high blood pressure: the tradition's safety record in these studies was good and some individual trials are promising, but pooled controlled evidence does not yet show blood-pressure reductions beyond placebo or medication. Given the risks of unmanaged hypertension, the review's own conclusion is that the evidence does not yet justify Ayurvedic approaches standing in for proven treatment.