Dong Quai (Danggui)

Moegi Tanaka et al. (2021) · PloS one

This randomized controlled trial with 77 analyzed women explored whether Yokukansan, a traditional Japanese Kampo herbal formula, can reduce anxiety around breast cancer surgery. Kampo is the Japanese adaptation of traditional herbal medicine, and Yokukansan combines seven herbal extracts that are traditionally prescribed for irritability, restlessness, and insomnia. Perioperative anxiety (anxiety in the period around an operation) matters because the authors link it to faster heart rate, higher blood pressure, longer postoperative pain, and a higher risk of postoperative delirium. Common anxiety medicines such as benzodiazepines can cause sedation, which is why a short-course herbal option was tested. Women aged 20 to 60 undergoing partial or total mastectomy at two Niigata hospitals in Japan were randomly assigned to a Yokukansan group or a control group. The Yokukansan group took two 2.5 g doses of a standardized extract granule, one at bedtime the night before surgery and one 2 hours before anesthesia; the control group received water. Anxiety was measured objectively with salivary alpha-amylase (an enzyme that rises with stress) and subjectively with two questionnaires, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Pain was rated on a 100-mm scale the day after surgery. Salivary alpha-amylase just before surgery was lower in the Yokukansan group than in controls (0.88 versus 1.14 on a log scale, p = 0.03), meaning a smaller physiological stress signal at that moment. HADS-Anxiety scores dropped by 2.77 points with Yokukansan and 1.43 points in controls (both significant, though the difference between groups did not reach significance, p = 0.083), and the authors suggest part of the drop may reflect reassurance once surgery was complete. Trait anxiety on the STAI fell by 4.23 points with Yokukansan and did not change in controls (p = 0.92), with a significant group-by-time interaction (p = 0.009). On both questionnaires higher scores mean more anxiety, so falling scores indicate improvement. Pain scores were nearly identical (1.4 versus 1.36, p = 0.70), and no adverse events were observed. The authors suggest two preoperative doses may reduce perioperative anxiety and that further research is justified. Several limitations apply. Patients knew which group they were in because no matching placebo exists for Kampo medicines, so reassurance may explain some of the effect. Salivary alpha-amylase measures stress generally, and the analyzed groups fell short of the planned size, leaving statistical power at 0.708. Pain was low in both groups, so any pain effect remains untested. Larger double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, including more invasive surgeries, are called for.

Bowen Xu et al. (2026) · Frontiers in endocrinology

This open-label randomized trial at Shanghai East Hospital compared two approaches to primary dysmenorrhea (menstrual cramping without an underlying pelvic disease) in 80 women aged 15 to 46: a Traditional Chinese Medicine protocol called Cai's Gynecology Cyclical Therapy, paired with a specific formula called the Stasis-Clearing and Meridian-Warming Method, versus standard ibuprofen. The TCM approach is built on a century-old idea from a Shanghai medical lineage: that treatment should change across the four phases of the menstrual cycle rather than staying the same throughout. Forty women received ibuprofen (a common anti-inflammatory pain reliever) for two days during each period, while the other forty received herbal decoctions -- different formulas depending on the cycle phase -- for three full menstrual cycles. Researchers tracked pain on a 0-to-10 visual pain scale and a symptom-severity score, and checked whether pain returned in the month after treatment ended. People collecting the follow-up data did not know which treatment each woman had received. Both treatments worked well overall (97.5% of women improved in each group), but the pattern of improvement differed. Ibuprofen relieved pain faster in the first month, as expected for a direct pain reliever. The herbal treatment started more slowly but kept improving month after month, and by the third month the two treatments were statistically equivalent on both pain and symptom scores. The most striking difference came after treatment stopped: only about 13% of the herbal-treatment group had their pain return the following month, compared to about 90% of the ibuprofen group. No side effects were reported in either group throughout the study. The researchers suggest this gap in relapse rates may reflect a real difference in how the two approaches work -- ibuprofen blocks pain-causing chemicals only while it is being taken, whereas the herbal protocol may produce a more lasting change. However, because patients and treating doctors could not be kept unaware of which treatment they were giving or receiving (an inherent challenge when comparing herbal decoctions to a standard pill), and because the study involved one hospital and a single follow-up cycle, the authors call for larger, multi-site studies with longer follow-up to confirm these findings.