Study
Probiotic vs. placebo and metformin: probiotic dietary intervention in polycystic ovary syndrome - A randomized controlled trial.
Valentin Borzan, Regina Riedl, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch · BMC endocrine disorders · 2023
Read the original paper ↗The short version
This phase IV, double-blind randomized controlled trial with 180 participants (ProPCO-RCT) explored whether a multi-strain probiotic supplement can improve hormone and metabolic markers in women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), a condition affecting up to one in five women that combines irregular periods, excess androgen (male hormone) activity, and polycystic ovaries. The trial's premise builds on prior findings that women with PCOS have a less diverse gut microbiome, which past research has linked to higher testosterone and greater insulin resistance. The study also examines equol, a compound gut bacteria make from soy isoflavones that has anti-androgenic properties, framing the gut microbiome as a possible lever on PCOS hormone levels. Participants (ages 18-45, meeting standard Rotterdam PCOS diagnostic criteria) were split into three groups of 60: a seven-strain probiotic sachet, a matching placebo, or open-label metformin (a standard PCOS drug), each taken daily for six months. The probiotic-versus-placebo comparison was blinded and allocation-concealed; the metformin group was not blinded. Measurements included blood hormone panels, an oral glucose tolerance test, a hirsutism (excess hair growth) score, body measurements, gut permeability and stool-microbiome testing (via genetic sequencing), and symptom and mood questionnaires, taken at the start and repeated at six months. As a protocol paper, this publication describes the trial's design rather than its findings — the primary comparison (change in free testosterone, probiotic versus placebo) had not yet been unblinded or analyzed at the time of publication. The one concrete number reported comes from the research group's earlier, smaller pilot study: 10 women taking the same probiotic for three months saw their free testosterone drop by a median of 0.3 pg/ml (range 1.7 down to 2.5 up), a result the team used to calculate that 60 participants per group would give the trial 80% power to detect a larger, expected 0.6 pg/ml reduction. The full trial adds metformin as a benchmark and follows participants for twice as long as most prior probiotic-PCOS studies the authors cite, several of which reported androgen and metabolic improvements with about 60 participants total. Because the results are not yet in, the paper's value lies in its design: registered with clinical trial authorities (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04593459), ethics-approved, and built to isolate a probiotic's effect from both an inert placebo and an established drug. The authors describe it as the first trial to test a probiotic against both comparators in PCOS. The protocol also flags a limitation the authors state plainly: recruitment began before the COVID-19 pandemic, and the trial's long six-month intervention window may make some participants unable to fully follow the schedule, which is why the statistical plan pre-specifies analyzing everyone as originally assigned. Readers looking for evidence of probiotic effectiveness in PCOS will need the trial's later results publication, not this one.
Key findings
- This paper is a published trial protocol (registered as ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04593459), not a report of study results; it describes how a randomized controlled trial of probiotics for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) was designed, before any outcome data were analyzed.
- The planned trial randomizes 180 women with PCOS into three groups of 60: a seven-strain probiotic supplement, a matching placebo, or open-label metformin (500 mg twice daily, a standard PCOS medication), each taken for six months.
- The main planned measurement (called the primary endpoint) is the change in free testosterone, a hormone, comparing the probiotic group to the placebo group; the metformin comparison is labeled exploratory rather than the trial's main question.
- The sample size of 60 per group was calculated using data from an earlier small pilot study of 10 women, in which three months of the same probiotic lowered free testosterone by a median of 0.3 pg/ml.
- Thirty of the 180 participants will also undergo gastroscopy and sigmoidoscopy (endoscopic procedures) to collect gut tissue samples, since the trial's broader premise is that gut bacteria composition may influence PCOS hormone levels.
Common questions
What healing modality was studied?
A multi-strain dietary probiotic supplement (seven bacterial strains plus vitamin D3) taken daily for six months, compared against a matched placebo and against open-label metformin (a pharmaceutical, not a botanical or traditional modality). No traditional healing system, herbal remedy, or manual technique is involved in this trial.
What condition was addressed?
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), diagnosed by Rotterdam criteria. Secondary measures relevant to PCOS include insulin resistance (via HOMA and Matsuda indices) and hirsutism (via the modified Ferriman-Gallwey score).
What were the main findings?
None are reported in this publication. This is a trial protocol (registered as NCT04593459) describing the design and statistical analysis plan of a still-unanalyzed randomized controlled trial of 180 participants; the only numeric result in the paper is from an earlier, separate pilot study of 10 participants, used to justify the sample size.
How strong is the evidence?
None yet, specific to efficacy: the trial had not been unblinded or analyzed at the time of this publication. The design itself is methodologically rigorous (randomized, double-blind and allocation-concealed for the probiotic-placebo comparison, power-calculated, SPIRIT-compliant, ethics-approved), but a protocol paper carries no outcome evidence.
What are the clinical implications?
None can be drawn from this publication alone. The authors state their hypothesis is that probiotic intervention will improve PCOS symptoms and androgen levels over six months; whether that hypothesis is supported will depend on the trial's results publication, which this paper does not contain.
This summary and its findings were generated by AI from the published paper and may contain imperfections. It describes a study and is not medical advice — talk to a qualified clinician about your own health (terms). The original study is always the source of truth — read it above.