Back to the records

Study

The Neuroscience of Religious and Spiritual Practices: A Systematic Review of Neurotheological Evidence.

Waqar Husain, Achraf Ammar, Urwa-Tul Wusqa, Maha Farooq, Zehra Tariq, Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal, Ahmed S BaHammam, Khaled Trabelsi, Mark D Griffiths, Amir Pakpour, Haitham Jahrami · Brain and behavior · 2026

Read the original paper ↗

The short version

This systematic review of 105 studies examined how religious and spiritual practices -- meditation, prayer, chanting, ritual, and mystical experience -- show up in brain scans. It pooled evidence across eight traditions (Buddhism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, Santo Daime, Spiritism, Sant Mat, and mixed traditions) and seven brain-imaging methods, filling a gap left by earlier reviews that each covered only one practice or one faith. Neurotheology, the scientific study of how spiritual experience relates to brain function, asks whether these ancient practices leave a measurable, functional signature on the nervous system. Researchers searched three major databases from their earliest records through mid-2026 and found 450 candidate studies; after removing duplicates and screening for eligibility, 105 studies remained. Each had to study real human participants using an objective brain-measurement tool -- functional or structural MRI, EEG, MEG, PET, SPECT, or similar -- during an actual religious, spiritual, or contemplative practice, not passive exposure to religious words or images. Because the studies varied enormously in tradition, practice, and method, the team combined findings narratively rather than statistically averaging them. Meditation studies (the largest group, 35 studies) consistently found quieter activity in the brain's default mode network, the circuit active during mind-wandering and self-focused thought, alongside more efficient attention-related brain activity in long-term practitioners. Prayer (21 studies) activated brain regions used for understanding other people's minds when prayer was personal and improvised, suggesting the brain treats sincere prayer like a real conversation, and activated reward circuitry during peak spiritual feelings among some worshippers. Chanting and recitation (25 studies) calmed emotional brain circuits -- OM chanting, for example, reduced activity along the same pathway targeted by an approved medical nerve-stimulation therapy. Mental-health-relevant findings (14 studies) included a randomized trial in which loving-kindness meditation eased depression symptoms in diagnosed patients, and a mindfulness program that lowered stress-hormone levels months later. Eleven studies of unusual states -- near-death imagery, ayahuasca ceremonies, and trance -- showed the most widespread brain-network changes of any practice type. The review's authors state plainly that religious and spiritual practices are neurologically real, measurable behaviors, not just subjective reports, and that the brain circuits they engage overlap with those disrupted in depression, anxiety, and addiction. They stop short of claiming these practices treat any diagnosed condition, since most studies involved healthy volunteers rather than patients. The search covered only English-language, peer-reviewed studies, and the wide variety of traditions and methods meant the team could describe patterns but not calculate a single combined effect size.

Key findings

  • This systematic review pooled 105 neuroimaging studies (1998-2026) across eight religious/spiritual traditions and seven brain-imaging methods (such as fMRI and EEG), the broadest cross-tradition synthesis of its kind to date.
  • Meditation practices (35 studies) were consistently linked to quieter activity in the brain's 'default mode network' (the circuit active during mind-wandering) and to more efficient attention-related brain activity among long-term practitioners.
  • Prayer (21 studies) activated brain regions used for understanding other people's minds when it was personal and improvised, and Islamic Salat was linked to measurable physical remodeling of the brain's white-matter connections (the corpus callosum) among habitual practitioners.
  • Fourteen studies tied specific practices to mental-health-relevant outcomes, including a randomized trial in which loving-kindness meditation reduced depression symptoms in diagnosed patients and a three-day mindfulness program that lowered stress-hormone levels four months later.
  • The review's authors caution that most of the 105 studies involved healthy volunteers, not diagnosed patients, so the findings show these practices engage mental-health-relevant brain circuits without proving that the practices treat any specific condition.

Common questions

What healing modality was studied?

The review covers mind-body and devotional practices broadly: meditation (including Transcendental Meditation, Vipassana, and Zen), prayer (Christian and Islamic), chanting and recitation (OM/mantra chanting, Quranic recitation, Dhikr), and ritual/mystical practices including ayahuasca ceremony and mediumistic trance.

What condition was addressed?

The review is not centered on one condition, but a subset of 14 included studies directly examined depression, anxiety, and stress outcomes, and it discusses mechanistic relevance to addiction and PTSD.

What were the main findings?

Religious and spiritual practices produced consistent, practice-specific neural changes: meditation suppressed default-mode-network activity, prayer engaged social-cognition and reward circuits, chanting produced limbic/autonomic calming, and mystical/ritual states produced the most widely distributed brain-network changes.

How strong is the evidence?

This is a high-quality, PRISMA-registered systematic review of 105 studies, but it uses narrative synthesis rather than meta-analysis (evidence too heterogeneous to pool), and most individual studies were small and observational rather than randomized clinical trials in diagnosed patients.

What are the clinical implications?

The authors state the reviewed circuits (default mode network, amygdala, hippocampus, reward pathways) are the same ones implicated in depression, anxiety, PTSD, and addiction, suggesting these widely available practices may be a relevant public-health resource, while explicitly stopping short of claiming the practices treat any diagnosed condition.

This summary and its findings were generated by AI from the published paper and may contain imperfections. It describes a study and is not medical advice — talk to a qualified clinician about your own health (terms). The original study is always the source of truth — read it above.