Study
Comparative efficacy of Medhya Rasayana,Bacopa monnieri, and Centella asiatica in enhancing memory and IQ of 8-10 year-old healthy boys: A prakriti-based double-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Jitesh Verma, Renu Rathi, Anamika, Bharat Rathi, Vidya Bhushan Pandey · Journal of Ayurveda and integrative medicine · 2025
Read the original paper ↗The short version
This 90-day randomized trial with 180 boys compared two classical Ayurvedic memory herbs, Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) and Mandookaparni (Centella asiatica, also known as Gotu Kola) head-to-head, using an individualized approach based on Ayurvedic constitution (Prakriti) — the framework describing a person's inborn balance of Vata, Pitta, and Kapha, the three governing principles Ayurveda uses to explain bodily and mental tendencies. Both herbs belong to a class Ayurveda calls Medhya Rasayana, or intellect-enhancers, traditionally used to support learning and memory since antiquity. Boys aged 8-10 with a clearly dominant Prakriti type were randomly assigned to receive either Brahmi or Mandookaparni as a traditional honey-and-ghee electuary, 20 grams daily for 90 days. Memory was measured with the PGI-CMS (a 10-part children's memory scale covering things like recall, attention, and recognition), and IQ was estimated with a drawing-based test, both given before and after the 90-day period. Both herbs meaningfully improved memory: the Brahmi group improved on 9 of 10 memory subsets and total memory score rose about 9% (p<0.01 throughout), while the Mandookaparni group improved on 8 subsets plus attention, with total memory score rising about 13% (p<0.01). Head-to-head, Mandookaparni edged out Brahmi on remote memory, delayed recall, visual recognition, and overall memory score. The advantage was strongest in boys with a Pitta-dominant constitution, where Mandookaparni outperformed Brahmi on nearly every measure, while Vata- and Kapha-constitution boys showed little difference between the two herbs. No side effects were reported with either treatment. The findings suggest both herbs are safe and effective memory-enhancers in healthy children, with Mandookaparni showing a possible edge in retaining and recalling older information. Because the trial compared the two herbs directly rather than against a placebo, it cannot say how much benefit either provides over no treatment at all. The single-center, boys-only design also means the results may not generalize to girls or other populations, and the authors call for larger, multi-site trials.
Key findings
- In a 90-day trial of 180 healthy boys aged 8-10, both Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) and Mandookaparni (Centella asiatica, or Gotu Kola) produced statistically significant improvements in memory and IQ when taken daily as a traditional Ayurvedic electuary.
- Mandookaparni showed a modest but statistically significant edge over Brahmi in remote memory, delayed recall, visual recognition, and overall memory score, suggesting a particular strength in retaining and recalling older information.
- The advantage of Mandookaparni over Brahmi was most pronounced in children with a Pitta-dominant Ayurvedic constitution, while children with Vata- or Kapha-dominant constitutions showed little difference between the two herbs.
- Because the trial compared the two herbs against each other rather than against a placebo or no-treatment group, it demonstrates comparative effectiveness but cannot establish how much benefit either herb provides over natural improvement or no intervention.
- No adverse events were reported with either herb over the 90-day study period, in a sample of otherwise healthy children.
Common questions
What healing modality was studied?
Herbal medicine within the Ayurvedic tradition: two classical Medhya Rasayana (intellect-enhancing) herbs, Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri) and Mandookaparni (Centella asiatica), prepared as traditional Avleha (electuary) formulations.
What condition was addressed?
Memory and cognitive performance (IQ) in healthy children — a wellness/nootropic use rather than a diagnosed disorder, framed within the Ayurvedic concept of Medha (intellect).
What were the main findings?
Both herbs significantly improved memory and IQ over 90 days; Mandookaparni showed statistically superior improvement to Brahmi in remote memory, delayed recall, visual recognition, and total memory score, with the largest advantage in children of Pitta-dominant constitution.
How strong is the evidence?
Moderate — a single-center, double-blind, randomized, active-comparator trial (n=180 analyzed) with validated outcome measures, but no placebo or untreated control group, so absolute (vs comparative) efficacy is not established.
What are the clinical implications?
Both herbs appear to be safe, effective options for supporting memory in children, and the findings suggest Ayurvedic constitution (Prakriti) may help guide which of the two herbs to favor, though this individualized approach needs validation in larger, multi-site trials.
This summary and its findings were generated by AI from the published paper and may contain imperfections. It describes a study and is not medical advice — talk to a qualified clinician about your own health (terms). The original study is always the source of truth — read it above.
Botanicals in this study
2 plantsWhat each plant did in this review — and how it's traditionally used.